Backport #24962 by @techknowlogick
caddy v1 is loong eol. v2 should be used.
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
(cherry picked from commit 8a6a1143a4)
Backport #24695 by @yardenshoham
Looks like a copy-paste leftover
- Fixes#20868
Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
(cherry picked from commit aa984f21fa)
- Use TXT records in order to determine the latest available version.
- This addresses a valid privacy issue, as with HTTP requests the server
can keep track(estimated) of how many instances are using Forgejo, with
DNS that's basically not possible as the server will never receive any
data, as the only ones receiving data are DNS resolvers.
(cherry picked from commit 0baefb546a)
(cherry picked from commit e8ee41880b)
(cherry picked from commit 7eca4f3bf1)
(cherry picked from commit 5c1567836c)
(cherry picked from commit 953afbc67f)
(cherry picked from commit fd9d97ab9f)
(cherry picked from commit 40fbd45eff)
(cherry picked from commit c5c904b04b)
(cherry picked from commit 48659bb3ab)
(cherry picked from commit b1fccd5093)
(cherry picked from commit 5e69573860)
Backport #23923 by @teauxfu
updated the example config to make the needed backticks around the
password more obvious
Co-authored-by: alex <alexmw777@gmail.com>
Backport #23733 by @wolfogre
I neglected that the `NameKey` of `Unit` is not only for translation,
but also configuration. So it should be `repo.actions` to maintain
consistency.
## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️
If users already use `actions.actions` in `DISABLED_REPO_UNITS` or
`DEFAULT_REPO_UNITS`, it will be treated as an invalid unit key.
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Follow #21962
After I eat my own dogfood, I would say that
ONLY_SHOW_RELEVANT_REPOS=false is necessary for many private/enterprise
instances, because many private repositories do not have
"description/topic", users just want to search by their names.
This PR also adds `PageIsExploreRepositories` check, to make code more
strict, because the `search` template is shared for different purpose.
And during the test, I found a bug that the "Search" button didn't
respect the "relevant" parameter, so this PR fixes the bug by the way
together.
Backport #23664 by @SuperSandro2000
Conflicts fixed by Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Sandro <sandro.jaeckel@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
