The WIP prefix toggling link on the sidebar only supported toggling
the *first* prefix specified in
`[repository.pullrequest].WORK_IN_PROGRESS_PREFIXES`. If the pull
request had a title with any other prefix, the first prefix listed in
the config was added (and then removed on toggling it off).
This little change makes all of the prefixes available for the
JavaScript function that does the toggling, and changes said function to
find the used prefix first, and toggle that.
When adding the prefix, it will still default to adding the first one
listed in the configuration, but it will happily remove any others if
those are present.
Fixes#3377.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit a93a99eef3)
This is a squashed result of conflict resolution for the following commits from Gitea:
- 36de5b299b
- 9a93b1816e
- 712e19fa6f
- 83850cc479
It is lacking CSS rule for archived labels, though.
Changes in this commit are authored by:
- 6543
- delvh
- silverwind
(cherry picked from commit 4b09dd11ec)
- Currently protected branch rules do not apply to admins, however in
some cases (like in the case of Forgejo project) you might also want to
apply these rules to admins to avoid accidental merges.
- Add new option to configure this on a per-rule basis.
- Adds integration tests.
- Resolves#65
Resolves#29965.
---
Manually tested this by:
- Following the
[installation](https://docs.gitea.com/next/installation/install-with-docker#basics)
guide (but built a local Docker image instead)
- Creating 2 users, one who is the `Owner` of a newly-created repository
and the other a `Collaborator`
- Had the `Collaborator` create a PR that the `Owner` reviews
- `Collaborator` resolves conversation and `Owner` merges PR
And with this change we see that we can no longer see re-request review
button for the `Owner`:
<img width="1351" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-25 at 12 39 18 AM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/60799661/bcd9c579-3cf7-474f-a51e-b436fe1a39a4">
(cherry picked from commit 242b331260925e604150346e61329097d5731e77)
We have to define this one in helpers.css because tailwind only
generates a single class but certain things rely on this being
double-class. Command ran:
```sh
perl -p -i -e 's#gt-hidden#tw-hidden#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* web_src/css/**/*
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit ec3d467f15a683b305ac165c3eba6683628dcb25)
Conflicts:
templates/install.tmpl
templates/repo/diff/conversation.tmpl
templates/repo/issue/view_content/conversation.tmpl
templates/repo/issue/view_content/sidebar.tmpl
templates/repo/issue/view_title.tmpl
resolved by prefering Forgejo version and applying the
commands to all files
These should be all simple inline styles that were left in the
templates.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
(cherry picked from commit 0bef9a2775af0e27a0754207fc87537b96c2792e)
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30005. Regression from
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/29945.
There was only once instance of `tw-content-center` before that PR, so I
just ran below command and reverted that one instance.
```sh
perl -p -i -e 's#tw-content-center#tw-items-center#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* tests/**/*
```
(cherry picked from commit 04f9ad056882fc3f21b247b16f84437adf0f36d8)
Conflicts:
templates/repo/diff/conversation.tmpl
templates/repo/header.tmpl
templates/repo/issue/filter_list.tmpl
templates/repo/issue/view_content/conversation.tmpl
templates/repo/wiki/view.tmpl
web_src/js/components/DashboardRepoList.vue
re-ran the command after discarding the Gitea changes to
ensure all Forgejo files are also covered
- Add `form-fetch-action` to indicate that this form POST to an link
that returns JSON and thus should be handled by Javascript code.
- Found by @fnetx
- Regression of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1793
Tested a few things, all working fine. Not sure if the chinese machine
translation is good.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7e8c1c5ba18e1ac8861f429b825163b8210fd178)
Conflicts:
docs/content/contributing/guidelines-frontend.zh-cn.md
Gitea docs
Replace 18 `gt-` prefixes with `tw-` with perl replacement. I manually
checked them all with `rg` afterwards.
(cherry picked from commit a2e90014ec20a1085449a66061389cfe0d12260f)
Conflicts:
templates/repo/header.tmpl
because some of the header moved to header_fork.tmpl
The value passed into "attachments" sub-template is from
"RedneredContent", so use the same name for consistent. And it makes
readers easy to know its data type.
(cherry picked from commit b8a598e6a43fa65db23b88d3b3b281b5f2f7c2e0)
Str2html was abused a lot. So use a proper name for it: SanitizeHTML
And add some tests to show its behavior.
(cherry picked from commit fb42972c057364a1dc99dfb528554e7a94415be7)
Conflicts:
docs/content/administration/mail-templates.en-us.md
docs/content/administration/mail-templates.zh-cn.md
prefer their version always
This PR touches the most interesting part of the "template refactoring".
1. Unclear variable type. Especially for "web/feed/convert.go":
sometimes it uses text, sometimes it uses HTML.
2. Assign text content to "RenderedContent" field, for example: `
project.RenderedContent = project.Description` in web/org/projects.go
3. Assign rendered content to text field, for example: `r.Note =
rendered content` in web/repo/release.go
4. (possible) Incorrectly calling `{{Str2html
.PackageDescriptor.Metadata.ReleaseNotes}}` in
package/content/nuget.tmpl, I guess the name Str2html misleads
developers to use it to "render string to html", but it only sanitizes.
if ReleaseNotes really contains HTML, then this is not a problem.
(cherry picked from commit e71eb8930a5d0f60874b038c223498b41ad65592)
Conflicts:
modules/templates/util_string.go
trivial context conflict
Some specific events on Gitlab issues and merge requests are stored
separately from comments as "resource state events". With this change,
all relevant resource state events are downloaded during issue and merge
request migration, and converted to comments.
This PR also updates the template used to render comments to add support
for migrated comments of these types.
ref: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/resource_state_events.html
(cherry picked from commit 17f170ee3724d8bdf2ddaad4211b12433f78ff0e)
Follow #29165
* some of them are incorrect, which would lead to double escaping (eg:
`(print (Escape $.RepoLink)`)
* other of them are not necessary, because `Tr` handles strings&HTML
automatically
Suggest to review by "unified view":
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/29394/files?diff=unified&w=0
(cherry picked from commit d2f6588b66549b33adf8bac7044d03c89d668470)
Conflicts:
templates/code/searchcombo.tmpl
templates/mail/auth/register_notify.tmpl
templates/mail/issue/default.tmpl
templates/repo/code/recently_pushed_new_branches.tmpl
templates/repo/search.tmpl
templates/repo/settings/protected_branch.tmpl
templates/user/auth/activate.tmpl
templates/user/auth/forgot_passwd.tmpl
templates/user/dashboard/feeds.tmpl
context
After this PR: no need to play with the Safe/Escape tricks anymore. See
the changes for more details.
(cherry picked from commit f9207b09479df964872d68842469991042b5497f)
Conflicts:
templates/repo/issue/view_title.tmpl
templates/user/settings/applications.tmpl
context
GitLab generates "system notes" whenever an event happens within the
platform. Unlike Gitea, those events are stored and retrieved as text
comments with no semantic details. The only way to tell whether a
comment was generated in this manner is the `system` flag on the note
type.
This PR adds detection for a new specific kind of event: Changing the
target branch of a PR. When detected, it is downloaded using Gitea's
type for this event, and eventually uploaded into Gitea in the expected
format, i.e. with no text content in the comment.
This PR also updates the template used to render comments to add support
for migrated comments of this type.
ref:
11bd6dc826/app/services/system_notes/merge_requests_service.rb (L102)
(cherry picked from commit 6e5966597c2d498d1a8540dad965461d44ff8e57)
GitLab generates "system notes" whenever an event happens within the
platform. Unlike Gitea, those events are stored and retrieved as text
comments with no semantic details. The only way to tell whether a
comment was generated in this manner is the `system` flag on the note
type.
This PR adds detection for two specific kinds of events: Scheduling and
un-scheduling of automatic merges on a PR. When detected, they are
downloaded using Gitea's type for these events, and eventually uploaded
into Gitea in the expected format, i.e. with no text content in the
comment.
This PR also updates the template used to render comments to add support
for migrated comments of these two types.
ref:
11bd6dc826/app/services/system_notes/merge_requests_service.rb (L6-L17)
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit a70c00b80bcb5de8479e407f1b8f08dcf756019d)
It's possible for reviews to not be assiocated with users, when they
were migrated from another forge instance. In the migration code,
there's no sanitization check for author names, so they could contain
HTML tags and thus needs to be properely escaped.
Follow #29165. These HTML strings are safe to be rendered directly, to
avoid double-escaping.
(cherry picked from commit a784ed3d6c6946fd9bf95f2e910f52f549326fe2)
Clarify when "string" should be used (and be escaped), and when
"template.HTML" should be used (no need to escape)
And help PRs like #29059 , to render the error messages correctly.
(cherry picked from commit f3eb835886031df7a562abc123c3f6011c81eca8)
Conflicts:
modules/web/middleware/binding.go
routers/web/feed/convert.go
tests/integration/branches_test.go
tests/integration/repo_branch_test.go
trivial context conflicts
Follow-up of #2282 and #2296 (which tried to address #2278)
One of the issue with the previous PR is that when a conversation on the Files tab was marked as "resolved", it would fetch all the comments for that line (even the outdated ones, which should not be shown on this page - except when explicitly activated).
To properly fix this, I have changed `FetchCodeCommentsByLine` to `FetchCodeConversation`. Its role is to fetch all comments related to a given (review, path, line) and reverted my changes in the template (which were based on a misunderstanding).
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2306
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
Co-committed-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
With this option, it is possible to require a linear commit history with
the following benefits over the next best option `Rebase+fast-forward`:
The original commits continue existing, with the original signatures
continuing to stay valid instead of being rewritten, there is no merge
commit, and reverting commits becomes easier.
Closes#24906
