forgejo/templates/user/settings/applications.tmpl

116 lines
4.8 KiB
Go HTML Template
Raw Normal View History

{{template "user/settings/layout_head" (dict "ctxData" . "pageClass" "user settings applications")}}
<div class="user-setting-content">
<h4 class="ui top attached header">
{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.manage_access_token"}}
</h4>
<div class="ui attached segment">
Introduce `flex-list` & `flex-item` elements for Gitea UI (#25790) This PR introduces a new UI element type for Gitea called `flex-item`. It consists of a horizontal card with a leading, main and trailing part: ![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/395dd3f3-3906-4481-8f65-be6ac0acbe03) The idea behind it is that in Gitea UI, we have many cases where we use this kind of layout, but it is achieved in many different ways: - grid layout - `.ui.list` with additional hacky flexbox - `.ui.key.list` - looks to me like a style set originally created for ssh/gpg key list, was used in many other places - `.issue.list` - created for issue cards, used in many other places - ... This new style is based on `.issue.list`, specifically the refactoring of it done in #25750. In this PR, the new element is introduced and lots of templates are being refactored to use that style. This allows to remove a lot of page-specific css, makes many of the elements responsive or simply provides a cleaner/better-looking way to present information. A devtest section with the new style is also available. <details> <summary>Screenshots (left: before, right: after)</summary> ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-01-21](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/545b7da5-b300-475f-bd6d-b7d836950bb5) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-01-56](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/b6f70415-6795-4f71-a5ea-117d56107ea1) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-02-45](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/47407121-3f2a-4778-8f6d-ad2687c2e7b3) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-03-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/76167aaf-c3b2-46f6-9ffd-709f20aa6a34) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-04-52](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/af8fdde5-711e-4524-99cf-fb5d68af85b9) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-05-25](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/ae406946-e3e4-4109-abfe-b3588a07b468) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-06-35](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/2dbacc04-24d6-4f91-9e42-e16d6e4b5f1f) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-09-03](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/d3ca4e56-a72f-4179-adc8-98bfd638025b) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-09-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/df1fa689-499c-4e54-b6fb-3b81644b725f) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-10-27](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/b21cac71-a85a-4c8c-bb99-ab90373d8e09) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-11-12](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/89be39cf-0af9-4f2d-9fca-42f9eb5e7824) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-12-01](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/079579ea-1ecb-49c0-b32b-b59ed957caec) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-17-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/61ac6ec4-a319-4d5c-9c99-2e02a77295ba) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-18-27](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/5b55b73f-6244-47f7-a3e6-c5e4a7474585) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-19-18](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/c1b7c22e-3e5a-46d4-b8d6-5560db478c0b) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-29-13](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/82ffca8d-ab2e-4a18-9954-5b685bf6a422) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-30-11](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/ad2fdccc-2be8-41bb-bfdc-a084aa387b61) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-32-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/2d298ba7-d084-48b5-a139-f86d56262110) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-33-28](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/4cbd838e-9de8-4ad0-8ed9-438da5c9a5cb) </details> --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-08-01 00:13:42 +02:00
<div class="flex-list">
<div class="flex-item">
{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.tokens_desc"}}
</div>
{{range .Tokens}}
Introduce `flex-list` & `flex-item` elements for Gitea UI (#25790) This PR introduces a new UI element type for Gitea called `flex-item`. It consists of a horizontal card with a leading, main and trailing part: ![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/395dd3f3-3906-4481-8f65-be6ac0acbe03) The idea behind it is that in Gitea UI, we have many cases where we use this kind of layout, but it is achieved in many different ways: - grid layout - `.ui.list` with additional hacky flexbox - `.ui.key.list` - looks to me like a style set originally created for ssh/gpg key list, was used in many other places - `.issue.list` - created for issue cards, used in many other places - ... This new style is based on `.issue.list`, specifically the refactoring of it done in #25750. In this PR, the new element is introduced and lots of templates are being refactored to use that style. This allows to remove a lot of page-specific css, makes many of the elements responsive or simply provides a cleaner/better-looking way to present information. A devtest section with the new style is also available. <details> <summary>Screenshots (left: before, right: after)</summary> ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-01-21](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/545b7da5-b300-475f-bd6d-b7d836950bb5) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-01-56](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/b6f70415-6795-4f71-a5ea-117d56107ea1) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-02-45](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/47407121-3f2a-4778-8f6d-ad2687c2e7b3) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-03-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/76167aaf-c3b2-46f6-9ffd-709f20aa6a34) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-04-52](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/af8fdde5-711e-4524-99cf-fb5d68af85b9) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-05-25](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/ae406946-e3e4-4109-abfe-b3588a07b468) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-06-35](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/2dbacc04-24d6-4f91-9e42-e16d6e4b5f1f) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-09-03](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/d3ca4e56-a72f-4179-adc8-98bfd638025b) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-09-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/df1fa689-499c-4e54-b6fb-3b81644b725f) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-10-27](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/b21cac71-a85a-4c8c-bb99-ab90373d8e09) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-11-12](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/89be39cf-0af9-4f2d-9fca-42f9eb5e7824) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-12-01](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/079579ea-1ecb-49c0-b32b-b59ed957caec) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-17-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/61ac6ec4-a319-4d5c-9c99-2e02a77295ba) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-18-27](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/5b55b73f-6244-47f7-a3e6-c5e4a7474585) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-19-18](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/c1b7c22e-3e5a-46d4-b8d6-5560db478c0b) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-29-13](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/82ffca8d-ab2e-4a18-9954-5b685bf6a422) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-30-11](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/ad2fdccc-2be8-41bb-bfdc-a084aa387b61) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-32-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/2d298ba7-d084-48b5-a139-f86d56262110) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-33-28](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/4cbd838e-9de8-4ad0-8ed9-438da5c9a5cb) </details> --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-08-01 00:13:42 +02:00
<div class="flex-item">
<div class="flex-item-leading">
<span class="text {{if .HasRecentActivity}}green{{end}}" {{if .HasRecentActivity}}data-tooltip-content="{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.token_state_desc"}}"{{end}}>
Introduce `flex-list` & `flex-item` elements for Gitea UI (#25790) This PR introduces a new UI element type for Gitea called `flex-item`. It consists of a horizontal card with a leading, main and trailing part: ![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/395dd3f3-3906-4481-8f65-be6ac0acbe03) The idea behind it is that in Gitea UI, we have many cases where we use this kind of layout, but it is achieved in many different ways: - grid layout - `.ui.list` with additional hacky flexbox - `.ui.key.list` - looks to me like a style set originally created for ssh/gpg key list, was used in many other places - `.issue.list` - created for issue cards, used in many other places - ... This new style is based on `.issue.list`, specifically the refactoring of it done in #25750. In this PR, the new element is introduced and lots of templates are being refactored to use that style. This allows to remove a lot of page-specific css, makes many of the elements responsive or simply provides a cleaner/better-looking way to present information. A devtest section with the new style is also available. <details> <summary>Screenshots (left: before, right: after)</summary> ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-01-21](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/545b7da5-b300-475f-bd6d-b7d836950bb5) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-01-56](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/b6f70415-6795-4f71-a5ea-117d56107ea1) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-02-45](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/47407121-3f2a-4778-8f6d-ad2687c2e7b3) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-03-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/76167aaf-c3b2-46f6-9ffd-709f20aa6a34) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-04-52](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/af8fdde5-711e-4524-99cf-fb5d68af85b9) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-05-25](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/ae406946-e3e4-4109-abfe-b3588a07b468) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-06-35](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/2dbacc04-24d6-4f91-9e42-e16d6e4b5f1f) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-09-03](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/d3ca4e56-a72f-4179-adc8-98bfd638025b) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-09-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/df1fa689-499c-4e54-b6fb-3b81644b725f) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-10-27](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/b21cac71-a85a-4c8c-bb99-ab90373d8e09) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-11-12](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/89be39cf-0af9-4f2d-9fca-42f9eb5e7824) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-12-01](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/079579ea-1ecb-49c0-b32b-b59ed957caec) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-17-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/61ac6ec4-a319-4d5c-9c99-2e02a77295ba) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-18-27](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/5b55b73f-6244-47f7-a3e6-c5e4a7474585) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-19-18](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/c1b7c22e-3e5a-46d4-b8d6-5560db478c0b) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-29-13](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/82ffca8d-ab2e-4a18-9954-5b685bf6a422) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-30-11](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/ad2fdccc-2be8-41bb-bfdc-a084aa387b61) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-32-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/2d298ba7-d084-48b5-a139-f86d56262110) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-33-28](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/4cbd838e-9de8-4ad0-8ed9-438da5c9a5cb) </details> --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-08-01 00:13:42 +02:00
{{svg "fontawesome-send" 32}}
</span>
</div>
Introduce `flex-list` & `flex-item` elements for Gitea UI (#25790) This PR introduces a new UI element type for Gitea called `flex-item`. It consists of a horizontal card with a leading, main and trailing part: ![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/395dd3f3-3906-4481-8f65-be6ac0acbe03) The idea behind it is that in Gitea UI, we have many cases where we use this kind of layout, but it is achieved in many different ways: - grid layout - `.ui.list` with additional hacky flexbox - `.ui.key.list` - looks to me like a style set originally created for ssh/gpg key list, was used in many other places - `.issue.list` - created for issue cards, used in many other places - ... This new style is based on `.issue.list`, specifically the refactoring of it done in #25750. In this PR, the new element is introduced and lots of templates are being refactored to use that style. This allows to remove a lot of page-specific css, makes many of the elements responsive or simply provides a cleaner/better-looking way to present information. A devtest section with the new style is also available. <details> <summary>Screenshots (left: before, right: after)</summary> ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-01-21](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/545b7da5-b300-475f-bd6d-b7d836950bb5) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-01-56](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/b6f70415-6795-4f71-a5ea-117d56107ea1) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-02-45](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/47407121-3f2a-4778-8f6d-ad2687c2e7b3) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-03-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/76167aaf-c3b2-46f6-9ffd-709f20aa6a34) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-04-52](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/af8fdde5-711e-4524-99cf-fb5d68af85b9) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-05-25](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/ae406946-e3e4-4109-abfe-b3588a07b468) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-06-35](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/2dbacc04-24d6-4f91-9e42-e16d6e4b5f1f) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-09-03](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/d3ca4e56-a72f-4179-adc8-98bfd638025b) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-09-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/df1fa689-499c-4e54-b6fb-3b81644b725f) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-10-27](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/b21cac71-a85a-4c8c-bb99-ab90373d8e09) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-11-12](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/89be39cf-0af9-4f2d-9fca-42f9eb5e7824) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-12-01](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/079579ea-1ecb-49c0-b32b-b59ed957caec) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-17-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/61ac6ec4-a319-4d5c-9c99-2e02a77295ba) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-18-27](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/5b55b73f-6244-47f7-a3e6-c5e4a7474585) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-19-18](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/c1b7c22e-3e5a-46d4-b8d6-5560db478c0b) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-29-13](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/82ffca8d-ab2e-4a18-9954-5b685bf6a422) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-30-11](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/ad2fdccc-2be8-41bb-bfdc-a084aa387b61) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-32-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/2d298ba7-d084-48b5-a139-f86d56262110) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-33-28](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/4cbd838e-9de8-4ad0-8ed9-438da5c9a5cb) </details> --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-08-01 00:13:42 +02:00
<div class="flex-item-main">
<details>
<summary><span class="flex-item-title">{{.Name}}</span></summary>
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
<p class="gt-my-2">
{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.repo_and_org_access"}}:
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
{{if .DisplayPublicOnly}}
{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.permissions_public_only"}}
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
{{else}}
{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.permissions_access_all"}}
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
{{end}}
</p>
<p class="gt-my-2">{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.permissions_list"}}</p>
<ul class="gt-my-2">
{{range .Scope.StringSlice}}
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
{{if (ne . $.AccessTokenScopePublicOnly)}}
<li>{{.}}</li>
{{end}}
{{end}}
</ul>
</details>
Introduce `flex-list` & `flex-item` elements for Gitea UI (#25790) This PR introduces a new UI element type for Gitea called `flex-item`. It consists of a horizontal card with a leading, main and trailing part: ![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/395dd3f3-3906-4481-8f65-be6ac0acbe03) The idea behind it is that in Gitea UI, we have many cases where we use this kind of layout, but it is achieved in many different ways: - grid layout - `.ui.list` with additional hacky flexbox - `.ui.key.list` - looks to me like a style set originally created for ssh/gpg key list, was used in many other places - `.issue.list` - created for issue cards, used in many other places - ... This new style is based on `.issue.list`, specifically the refactoring of it done in #25750. In this PR, the new element is introduced and lots of templates are being refactored to use that style. This allows to remove a lot of page-specific css, makes many of the elements responsive or simply provides a cleaner/better-looking way to present information. A devtest section with the new style is also available. <details> <summary>Screenshots (left: before, right: after)</summary> ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-01-21](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/545b7da5-b300-475f-bd6d-b7d836950bb5) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-01-56](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/b6f70415-6795-4f71-a5ea-117d56107ea1) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-02-45](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/47407121-3f2a-4778-8f6d-ad2687c2e7b3) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-03-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/76167aaf-c3b2-46f6-9ffd-709f20aa6a34) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-04-52](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/af8fdde5-711e-4524-99cf-fb5d68af85b9) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-05-25](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/ae406946-e3e4-4109-abfe-b3588a07b468) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-06-35](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/2dbacc04-24d6-4f91-9e42-e16d6e4b5f1f) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-09-03](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/d3ca4e56-a72f-4179-adc8-98bfd638025b) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-09-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/df1fa689-499c-4e54-b6fb-3b81644b725f) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-10-27](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/b21cac71-a85a-4c8c-bb99-ab90373d8e09) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-11-12](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/89be39cf-0af9-4f2d-9fca-42f9eb5e7824) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-12-01](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/079579ea-1ecb-49c0-b32b-b59ed957caec) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-17-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/61ac6ec4-a319-4d5c-9c99-2e02a77295ba) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-18-27](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/5b55b73f-6244-47f7-a3e6-c5e4a7474585) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-19-18](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/c1b7c22e-3e5a-46d4-b8d6-5560db478c0b) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-29-13](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/82ffca8d-ab2e-4a18-9954-5b685bf6a422) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-30-11](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/ad2fdccc-2be8-41bb-bfdc-a084aa387b61) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-32-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/2d298ba7-d084-48b5-a139-f86d56262110) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-33-28](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/4cbd838e-9de8-4ad0-8ed9-438da5c9a5cb) </details> --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-08-01 00:13:42 +02:00
<div class="flex-item-body">
<i>{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.added_on" (DateTime "short" .CreatedUnix)}}{{svg "octicon-info"}} {{if .HasUsed}}{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.last_used"}} <span {{if .HasRecentActivity}}class="text green"{{end}}>{{DateTime "short" .UpdatedUnix}}</span>{{else}}{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.no_activity"}}{{end}}</i>
</div>
</div>
Introduce `flex-list` & `flex-item` elements for Gitea UI (#25790) This PR introduces a new UI element type for Gitea called `flex-item`. It consists of a horizontal card with a leading, main and trailing part: ![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/395dd3f3-3906-4481-8f65-be6ac0acbe03) The idea behind it is that in Gitea UI, we have many cases where we use this kind of layout, but it is achieved in many different ways: - grid layout - `.ui.list` with additional hacky flexbox - `.ui.key.list` - looks to me like a style set originally created for ssh/gpg key list, was used in many other places - `.issue.list` - created for issue cards, used in many other places - ... This new style is based on `.issue.list`, specifically the refactoring of it done in #25750. In this PR, the new element is introduced and lots of templates are being refactored to use that style. This allows to remove a lot of page-specific css, makes many of the elements responsive or simply provides a cleaner/better-looking way to present information. A devtest section with the new style is also available. <details> <summary>Screenshots (left: before, right: after)</summary> ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-01-21](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/545b7da5-b300-475f-bd6d-b7d836950bb5) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-01-56](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/b6f70415-6795-4f71-a5ea-117d56107ea1) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-02-45](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/47407121-3f2a-4778-8f6d-ad2687c2e7b3) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-03-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/76167aaf-c3b2-46f6-9ffd-709f20aa6a34) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-04-52](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/af8fdde5-711e-4524-99cf-fb5d68af85b9) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-05-25](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/ae406946-e3e4-4109-abfe-b3588a07b468) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-06-35](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/2dbacc04-24d6-4f91-9e42-e16d6e4b5f1f) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-09-03](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/d3ca4e56-a72f-4179-adc8-98bfd638025b) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-09-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/df1fa689-499c-4e54-b6fb-3b81644b725f) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-10-27](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/b21cac71-a85a-4c8c-bb99-ab90373d8e09) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-11-12](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/89be39cf-0af9-4f2d-9fca-42f9eb5e7824) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-12-01](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/079579ea-1ecb-49c0-b32b-b59ed957caec) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-17-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/61ac6ec4-a319-4d5c-9c99-2e02a77295ba) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-18-27](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/5b55b73f-6244-47f7-a3e6-c5e4a7474585) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-19-18](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/c1b7c22e-3e5a-46d4-b8d6-5560db478c0b) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-29-13](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/82ffca8d-ab2e-4a18-9954-5b685bf6a422) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-30-11](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/ad2fdccc-2be8-41bb-bfdc-a084aa387b61) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-32-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/2d298ba7-d084-48b5-a139-f86d56262110) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-33-28](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/4cbd838e-9de8-4ad0-8ed9-438da5c9a5cb) </details> --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-08-01 00:13:42 +02:00
<div class="flex-item-trailing">
<button class="ui red tiny button delete-button" data-modal-id="delete-token" data-url="{{$.Link}}/delete" data-id="{{.ID}}">
{{svg "octicon-trash" 16 "gt-mr-2"}}
{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.delete_token"}}
Introduce `flex-list` & `flex-item` elements for Gitea UI (#25790) This PR introduces a new UI element type for Gitea called `flex-item`. It consists of a horizontal card with a leading, main and trailing part: ![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/395dd3f3-3906-4481-8f65-be6ac0acbe03) The idea behind it is that in Gitea UI, we have many cases where we use this kind of layout, but it is achieved in many different ways: - grid layout - `.ui.list` with additional hacky flexbox - `.ui.key.list` - looks to me like a style set originally created for ssh/gpg key list, was used in many other places - `.issue.list` - created for issue cards, used in many other places - ... This new style is based on `.issue.list`, specifically the refactoring of it done in #25750. In this PR, the new element is introduced and lots of templates are being refactored to use that style. This allows to remove a lot of page-specific css, makes many of the elements responsive or simply provides a cleaner/better-looking way to present information. A devtest section with the new style is also available. <details> <summary>Screenshots (left: before, right: after)</summary> ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-01-21](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/545b7da5-b300-475f-bd6d-b7d836950bb5) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-01-56](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/b6f70415-6795-4f71-a5ea-117d56107ea1) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-02-45](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/47407121-3f2a-4778-8f6d-ad2687c2e7b3) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-03-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/76167aaf-c3b2-46f6-9ffd-709f20aa6a34) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-04-52](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/af8fdde5-711e-4524-99cf-fb5d68af85b9) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-05-25](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/ae406946-e3e4-4109-abfe-b3588a07b468) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-06-35](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/2dbacc04-24d6-4f91-9e42-e16d6e4b5f1f) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-09-03](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/d3ca4e56-a72f-4179-adc8-98bfd638025b) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-09-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/df1fa689-499c-4e54-b6fb-3b81644b725f) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-10-27](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/b21cac71-a85a-4c8c-bb99-ab90373d8e09) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-11-12](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/89be39cf-0af9-4f2d-9fca-42f9eb5e7824) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-12-01](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/079579ea-1ecb-49c0-b32b-b59ed957caec) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-17-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/61ac6ec4-a319-4d5c-9c99-2e02a77295ba) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-18-27](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/5b55b73f-6244-47f7-a3e6-c5e4a7474585) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-19-18](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/c1b7c22e-3e5a-46d4-b8d6-5560db478c0b) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-29-13](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/82ffca8d-ab2e-4a18-9954-5b685bf6a422) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-30-11](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/ad2fdccc-2be8-41bb-bfdc-a084aa387b61) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-32-44](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/2d298ba7-d084-48b5-a139-f86d56262110) ![Bildschirmfoto vom 2023-07-09 21-33-28](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/4cbd838e-9de8-4ad0-8ed9-438da5c9a5cb) </details> --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-08-01 00:13:42 +02:00
</button>
</div>
</div>
{{end}}
</div>
</div>
<div class="ui attached bottom segment">
<h5 class="ui top header">
{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.generate_new_token"}}
</h5>
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
<form id="scoped-access-form" class="ui form ignore-dirty" action="{{.Link}}" method="post">
{{.CsrfTokenHtml}}
<div class="field {{if .Err_Name}}error{{end}}">
<label for="name">{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.token_name"}}</label>
<input id="name" name="name" value="{{.name}}" autofocus required maxlength="255">
</div>
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
<div class="field">
<label>{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.repo_and_org_access"}}</label>
<label class="tw-cursor-pointer">
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
<input class="enable-system gt-mt-2 gt-mr-2" type="radio" name="scope" value="{{$.AccessTokenScopePublicOnly}}">
{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.permissions_public_only"}}
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
</label>
<label class="tw-cursor-pointer">
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
<input class="enable-system gt-mt-2 gt-mr-2" type="radio" name="scope" value="" checked>
{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.permissions_access_all"}}
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
</label>
</div>
<details class="ui optional field">
<summary class="gt-pb-4 gt-pl-2">
{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.select_permissions"}}
</summary>
<p class="activity meta">
<i>{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.access_token_desc" (`href="/api/swagger" target="_blank"`|SafeHTML) (`href="https://forgejo.org/docs/latest/user/token-scope/" target="_blank"`|SafeHTML)}}</i>
</p>
<div class="scoped-access-token-mount">
<scoped-access-token-selector
:is-admin="{{if .IsAdmin}}true{{else}}false{{end}}"
no-access-label="{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.permission_no_access"}}"
read-label="{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.permission_read"}}"
write-label="{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.permission_write"}}"
></scoped-access-token-selector>
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
</div>
</details>
<button id="scoped-access-submit" class="ui primary button">
{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.generate_token"}}
</button>
</form>{{/* Fomantic ".ui.form .warning.message" is hidden by default, so put the warning message out of the form*/}}
<div id="scoped-access-warning" class="ui warning message center gt-hidden">
{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.at_least_one_permission"}}
</div>
</div>
2019-03-08 17:42:50 +01:00
{{if .EnableOAuth2}}
{{template "user/settings/grants_oauth2" .}}
2019-03-08 17:42:50 +01:00
{{template "user/settings/applications_oauth2" .}}
{{end}}
</div>
2015-08-18 21:36:16 +02:00
<div class="ui g-modal-confirm delete modal" id="delete-token">
Refactor delete_modal_actions template and use it for project column related actions (#24097) Co-Author: @wxiaoguang This PR is to fix https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/23318#issuecomment-1506275446 . The way to fix this in this PR is to use `delete_modal_actions.tmpl` here both to fix this issue and keep ui consistency (as suggested by [TODO here](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/4299c3b7db61f8741eca0ba3d663bb65745a4acc/templates/projects/view.tmpl#L161)) And this PR also refactors `delete_modal_actions.tmpl` and its related styles, and use the template for more modal actions: 1. Added template attributes: * locale * ModalButtonStyle: "yes" (default) or "confirm" * ModalButtonCancelText * ModalButtonOkText 2. Rename `delete_modal_actions.tmpl` template to `modal_actions_confirm.tmpl` because it is not only used for action modals deletion now. 3. Refactored css related to modals into `web_src/css/modules/modal.css` and improved the styles. 4. Also use the template for PR deletion modal and remove issue dependency modal. 5. Some modals should also use the template, but not sure how to open them, so mark these modal actions by `{{/* TODO: Convert to base/modal_actions_confirm */}}` After (Also tested on arc green): Hovering on the left buttons <img width="711" alt="Screen Shot 2023-04-23 at 15 17 12" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17645053/233825650-76307e65-9255-44bb-80e8-7062f58ead1b.png"> <img width="786" alt="Screen Shot 2023-04-23 at 15 17 21" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17645053/233825652-4dc6f7d1-a180-49fb-a468-d60950eaee0d.png"> Test for functionalities: https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17645053/233826857-76376fda-022c-42d0-b0f3-339c17ca4e59.mov --------- Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-04-23 11:24:19 +02:00
<div class="header">
{{svg "octicon-trash"}}
{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.access_token_deletion"}}
</div>
<div class="content">
<p>{{ctx.Locale.Tr "settings.access_token_deletion_desc"}}</p>
</div>
2023-09-24 22:31:58 +02:00
{{template "base/modal_actions_confirm" (dict "ModalButtonColors" "yellow")}}
2014-11-12 12:48:50 +01:00
</div>
{{template "user/settings/layout_footer" .}}